DIAZ - v - SEC OF FINANCE

Facts:
1.       Petitioners Diaz and Timbol filed this petition for declaratory relief assailing the validity of the impending imposition of VAT by the BIR on the collections of tollway operators.
2.       Petitioners hold the view that Congress did not, when it enacted the NIRC, intend to include toll fees within the meaning of sale of services that are subject to VAT.
3.       On August 2010 the Court issued TRO enjoining the implementation of the VAT. The Court required the government, represented by respondents Purisima, Secretary of the DOF, and Henares, CIR, to comment on the petition
4.       The OSG filed the governments comment: NIRC imposes VAT on all kinds of services of franchise grantees, including tollway operations, except where the law provides otherwise.


Issues:
1. WON the government is unlawfully expanding VAT coverage by including tollway operators and tollway operations
2. WON the imposition of VAT on tollway operators amounts to a tax on tax and not a tax on services; is not administratively feasible and cannot be implemented.

Held:
1.       The relevant law in this case is Section 108[1] of the NIRC, as amended. VAT is levied, assessed, and collected on the gross receipts derived from the sale or exchange of services as well as from the use or lease of properties.
-          The law imposes VAT on all kinds of services rendered in the Philippines for a fee. By qualifying services with the words all kinds, Congress has given the term services an all-encompassing meaning.
-          The listing of specific services are intended to illustrate how pervasive and broad is the VATs reach rather than establish concrete limits to its application. Thus, every activity that can be imagined as a form of service rendered for a fee should be deemed included unless some provision of law especially excludes it.
-          P.D. 1112 (Toll Operation Decree): tollway operators construct, maintain, and operate expressways (tollways), at the operators expense. Thus the operators are allowed to collect government-approved fees from motorists using the tollways until such operators could fully recover their expenses and earn reasonable returns from their investments.
-          Not only do tollway operators come under the broad term all kinds of services, they also come under the specific class described in Section 108 as all other franchise grantees who are subject to VAT. The word franchise broadly covers government grants of a special right to do an act or series of acts of public concern.
-          Tollway operators are not among the franchise grantees subject to franchise tax under section 119. Neither are their services among the VAT-exempt transactions under Section 109 of the Code.

2.       Fees paid by the public to tollway operators for use of the tollways, are not taxes in any sense.

Tax
Toll Fees
imposed under the taxing power of the government principally for the purpose of raising revenues to fund public expenditures
collected by private tollway operators as reimbursement for the costs and expenses incurred in the construction, maintenance and operation of the tollways, as well as to assure them a reasonable margin of income


-       VAT on tollway operations cannot be deemed a tax on tax due to the nature of VAT as an indirect tax à The seller who is liable for the VAT may shift or pass on the amount of VAT it paid on goods, properties or services to the buyer. In such a case, what is transferred is not the sellers liability but merely the burden of the VAT. Once shifted, the VAT ceases to be a tax and simply becomes part of the cost that the buyer must pay in order to purchase the good, property or service.
-          Administrative feasibility is one of the canons of a sound tax system. It simply means that the tax system should be capable of being effectively administered and enforced with the least inconvenience to the taxpayer. Non-observance of the canon, however, will not render a tax imposition invalid except to the extent that specific constitutional or statutory limitations are impaired. Even if the imposition of VAT on tollway operations may seem burdensome to implement, it is not necessarily invalid unless some aspect of it is shown to violate any law or the Constitution.
-          Any declaration by the Court that the manner of its implementation is illegal or unconstitutional would be premature. Any concern about how the VAT on tollway operations will be enforced must first be addressed to the BIR on whom the task of implementing tax laws primarily and exclusively rests. The Court cannot preempt the BIRs discretion on the matter, absent any clear violation of law or the Constitution.

Note: I made this case digest when I was still a law student. The ones posted on my blog were not due for submission as part of any academic requirement. I want to remind you that there is no substitute to reading the full text of the case! Use at your own risk.




[1] The phrase sale or exchange of services means the performance of all kinds of services in the Philippines for others for a fee, remuneration or consideration, including those performed or rendered by construction and service contractors; stock, real estate, commercial, customs and immigration brokers; lessors of property, whether personal or real; warehousing services; lessors or distributors of cinematographic films; persons engaged in milling, processing, manufacturing or repacking goods for others; proprietors, operators or keepers of hotels, motels, resthouses, pension houses, inns, resorts; proprietors or operators of restaurants, refreshment parlors, cafes and other eating places, including clubs and caterers; dealers in securities; lending investors; transportation contractors on their transport of goods or cargoes, including persons who transport goods or cargoes for hire and other domestic common carriers by land relative to their transport of goods or cargoes; common carriers by air and sea relative to their transport of passengers, goods or cargoes from one place in the Philippines to another place in the Philippines; sales of electricity by generation companies, transmission, and distribution companies; services of franchise grantees of electric utilities, telephone and telegraph, radio and television broadcasting and all other franchise grantees except those under Section 119 of this Code and non-life insurance companies (except their crop insurances), including surety, fidelity, indemnity and bonding companies; and similar services regardless of whether or not the performance thereof calls for the exercise or use of the physical or mental faculties.