Borromeo - v - Descallar
GR No. 159310, Feb. 24, 2009
Facts:
1.
Wilhelm
Jambrich, an Austrian met respondent Antonietta Opalla-Descallar, a separated
mother of two boys who was working as a waitress in 1984. Jambrich and
respondent fell in love and decided to live together. They transferred to their
own house and lots at Agro-Macro Subdivision, Cabancalan, Mandaue City. In the
Contracts to Sell covering the properties, Jambrich and respondent were
referred to as the buyers. A Deed of Absolute Sale was likewise issued in their
favor but registration was refused on the ground that Jambrich was an alien and
could not acquire alienable lands of the public domain. Jambrich's name was
erased from the document. Jambrich formally adopted respondent's two sons. The
idyll lasted only until 1991.
3.
Petitioner
filed a complaint against respondent for recovery of real property before the
RTC Mandaue
1.
Petitioner:
Respondent did not pay a single centavo of the purchase price and was not in
fact a buyer; that it was Jambrich alone who paid for the properties using his
exclusive funds; that Jambrich was the real and absolute owner of the
properties; and, that petitioner acquired absolute ownership by virtue of the Deed
of Absolute Sale/Assignment dated which Jambrich executed in his favor.
2.
Respondent:
She claimed that she "solely and exclusively used her own personal funds
to defray and pay for the purchase price of the subject lots in question,"
and that Jambrich, being an alien, was prohibited to acquire or own real
property in the Philippines.
4.
RTC
decision: Declared plaintiff (Jambrich) as the owner in fee
simple over the residential house of strong materials and three parcels of land
issued by the Register of Deeds of Mandaue City; respondent appealed to the CA
5.
CA
decision: The title of the subject property is not in the name of Jambrich but
in the name of defendant-appellant. Jambrich could not have transferred a
property he has no title thereto.
Issue:
WON Jamich could acquire the subject property?
Held/Ratio:
Granted. Affirms RTC decision.
In United Church Board for World
Ministries v. Sebastian, the Court reiterated the consistent ruling in a number
of cases that if land is invalidly transferred to an alien who subsequently
becomes a Filipino citizen or transfers it to a Filipino, the flaw in the
original transaction is considered cured and the title of the transferee is
rendered valid. Applying United Church Board for World Ministries, the
trial court ruled in favor of petitioner, viz.: [W]hile the acquisition and the
purchase of (sic) Wilhelm Jambrich of the properties under litigation [were]
void ab initio since [they were] contrary to the Constitution of the
Philippines, he being a foreigner, yet, the acquisition of these properties by
plaintiff who is a Filipino citizen from him, has cured the flaw in the
original transaction and the title of the transferee is valid.
Note: I made this case digest when I was still a law student. The ones posted on my blog were not due for submission as part of any academic requirement. I want to remind you that there is no substitute to reading the full text of the case! Use at your own risk.
Note: I made this case digest when I was still a law student. The ones posted on my blog were not due for submission as part of any academic requirement. I want to remind you that there is no substitute to reading the full text of the case! Use at your own risk.
